In England, the main currency is called the pound. Smaller units are called shillings and pence. A pound is 20 shillings, a shilling is 5 pence, hence a pound is 100 pence. This system has been in place since 1971; before 1971, a shilling was 12 pence. There are many slang equivalents for these: bob for shilling, quid for (paper) pound.

There is a term in use that is of a different nature: the guinea. The guinea is not a name for a coin or a bill, but the name for a value. One guinea represents the same as one pound and one shilling, or 21 shillings. A Wikipedia article says that guineas are used by art dealers and lawyers to quote their prices, and British horse races still express their prize funds in guineas. Guineas can also be used if a value is not a whole number of guineas. You can have a fifth of a pound (4 shillings), and you can likewise have a third of a guinea (7 shillings). The convenience of dividing by three is sometimes offered as a reason why the guinea is still around. For somebody raised outside of this culture, like me, it isn’t easy to appreciate the appeal of having both pounds and guineas around (even if the guinea doesn’t exist as a coin or bill).

The relationship between pounds and shillings and guineas gives us an interesting background in which to talk about expressing things in terms of different units. The process of stating something in new units is often called *transformation*, and I’ve suggested earlier that transformations are a frequent source for encountering matrices, and specifically square matrices.

I’m going to take the shilling/pound/guinea situation as a starting point. I’m not suggesting that any of the things to follow here will be things that Englishfolk are actually discussing doing. For one, I’m going to ignore the penny altogether. To be more precise, my starting point will be that we have three units of value, and one of these is worth the sum of the other two. I’m even going to ignore that we know the pound to be worth 20 shillings. (The things I’m ignoring could be brought back into the picture later, without too much difficulty. For now, I’m interested in keeping the example and the numbers simple.)

In this hypothetical England, I could represent values as a vector in different ways. Let’s start with some number of guineas, and some number of shillings. Below is an example:

Here, the amount is 3 guineas and 5 shillings. This same value could be re-stated in terms of pounds and shillings. This is important: the same amount, but in a different representation.

It is not particularly difficult to convert from one representation to the other, in either direction. The conversion is simple enough that any mention of matrix multiplication would sound like absolute overkill. Still, this example is useful to introduce the structure of a transformation matrix, and this will help us when we look at more practical examples where the conversion isn’t quite so trivial.

Let’s first look at conversion to the pounds/shilling representation. Shown above is each of the units of the guinea/shilling representation, expressed in the pounds/shilling representation. A single guinea is one pound and one shilling; and a single shilling is zero pounds and one shilling. These two vectors can be combined in a matrix:

and this matrix is called a transformation matrix. The conversion from guinea/shilling to pound/shilling can now be expressed as a matrix-vector multiplication using this transformation matrix:

where the original representation is on the top right, the transformation matrix is on the left, and the resulting representation in pound/shilling is on the right. You can check to see that it works, and that it will work for any amounts expressed in guineas and shillings. Yes, matrix multiplication is overkill here, but it does work and it does allow us to illustrate something useful.

To finish this post, let me briefly show how conversion in the opposite direction would work – conversion from a value in the pound/shilling representation to a value in the guinea/shilling representation. (Note: for the moment I’m ignoring that a pound equals 20 shilling altogether.) The conversion from pound/shilling to guinea/shilling can also be expressed using a transformation matrix, and we will look at the relationship between the two transformation matrices in the next post. In this post, I’ll merely introduce it:

The transformation matrix reflects (in its pound column) that one pound equals one guinea minus one shilling, and reflects (in its shilling column) that one shilling equals zero guineas plus one shilling. You can verify that the matrix multiplication works, and will work for other pound/shilling amounts (as long as you allow negative shilling amounts and continue to ignore the issue of breaking pounds into shillings).

Pingback: Groupings, Shopping Lists, Vectors: part 21 « Learning and Unlearning Math

Pingback: Groupings, Shopping Lists, Vectors: part 24 « Learning and Unlearning Math

Pingback: Groupings, Shopping Lists, and Vectors: The Series « Learning and Unlearning Math